top of page

Laws & Acts 

Click below to view a specific act!

 

 

 

 

 

The Endangered Species Act

 

        The Endangered Species Act (ESA) was passed in the United States in 1973 to identify threatened and endangered species in the country and abroad and give them protection. This act is considered to be the most far-reaching environmental law ever created by some scientists and conservationists. Under the ESA, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) is required to list and identify species to add or remove from the act. After years of petitioning and a few lawsuits, the Center for Biological Diversity was finally able to get the USFWS to add the California Tiger Salamander populations from Santa Barbara, Sonoma County, and central California to the act in 2004.  

 

        A few months after the California Tiger Salamander’s addition to the act, USFWS designated “399,666 acres of critical habitat for the central California population, but

gutted almost half of the protected areas, leaving the final critical habitat designation at only 199,109 acres.” (Action Timeline, 2012) USFWS has added critical habitat for California Tiger Salamanders in Yolo, Solano, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Amador, Calaveras, Stanislaus, Merced, Madera, Alameda, Fresno, Tulare, Santa Clara, San Benito, Monterey, Kern and San Luis Obispo counties. However, with each designation they have decreased the total number of acres allotted by thousands

of acres to let development take place.

 

      However, the California Tiger Salamander is only considered threatened under the Federal ESA. The California Tiger Salamander is listed as endangered under the California Endangered Species Act in Sonoma County and Santa Barbara. “Under federal law, proposing to list a species as threatened and endangered confers little official protection to the species.” (Petition to the State of California Fish and Game Commission: Supporting Information for the California Tiger Salamander, 2004) According to the Center for Biological Biodiversity, “…laws have been insufficient to prevent past and ongoing losses of the limited habitat for the California Tiger

Salamander, and are unlikely to prevent further declines of the species… current federal, state and local management has been and will continue to be inadequate to ensure the survival and recovery of the California Tiger Salamander.” To summarize, the USFWS has continued to neglect the plight of the California Tiger Salamander and methods of federal management have proven to provide insufficient protection. The ESA requires a recovery plan for listed species with the goal of improving the status of the species to a point where it no longer needs to be on the ESA list. “A recovery plan includes scientific information about the species and provides criteria that help us to gauge whether downlisting or delisting the species is warranted.” (Henry, 2015)

 

 

 

 

 

  *Note: A final draft of the California Tiger Salamander Recovery Plan has not yet been                 posted. 

 

                     To view the draft, click here!   

 

                     Also, the ESA requires that recovery draft plans are open to the public

                     for review and comment! Email the USFWS Field Supervisor at:                                            sbcts_rp@fws.gov. to give your own thoughts! 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ESA
Anchor 1

Objectives of the Recovery Plan

In April 2015, a draft recovery plan was posted with the following objectives:

   1.“Protect and manage sufficient habitat within the metapopulation areas to support long-term viability of the Santa Barbara County DPS of the California Tiger Salamander.

   2. Reduce or remove other

 

 

threats to the Santa Barbara

 

 

County DPS of the California

 

 

tiger salamander.”

 

The California Endangered Species Act

      In 1970, The California Endangered Species Act (CESA) was established. It states, “...all native species animals, plants, and their habitats, threatened with extinction and those experiencing a significant decline which, if not halted, would lead to a threatened or endangered designation, will be protected or preserved.” (California Fish and Wildlife Department, 2015) This act is enforced by the California Fish and Wildlife Department (CFWD). After a slim vote of 3-2, the CFWD voted to designate the California Tiger Salamander as threatened under the CESA since early 2010. “After six years of misguided denial and delay by the California Fish and Game Commission, the California Tiger Salamander is finally getting the protection it deserves and sorely needs,” said Brian Nowicki of the Center for Biological Diversity.

      The California Tiger Salamander was added after several studies indicated a rapid decline in their population stocks due to impacts from urban and agricultural development. “In recent decades, at least 75 percent of the salamander’s habitat throughout the state has been eliminated.” (California Tiger Salamander Declared Candidate for Listing Under California Endangered Species Act, 2010) Adding the California Tiger Salamander has put more pressure on the ESA to tighten regulations, but much can still be done to save the salamanders. Land is still being lost to development in many areas where these salamanders dwell.

 

California Environmental Quality Act

       

      The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) was passed in 1970 and remains today to be one of the most broad environmental laws (History of CEQA, 2012). Like the CESA, the Department of California Fish and Wildlife implement this act. It helps issue permits and approval for development projects by following a rough criterion to make sure projects are economically and environmentally sensible. However, in 2004 the Center for Biological Diversity uncovered that at least 118 development projects were under way in areas of current or potential California Tiger Salamander habitat, proof that the CEQA clearly wasn’t doing its job (Rare Salamander Enters Debate Over Casinos and Sprawl, 2004).

 

bottom of page